An excellent week.
In the features, find a concise reminder of how leaders can support teachers and a thorough reflection on alternative grading. Both are detailed and practical.
In the rest of the issue, childhood and early adolescence seem a theme this week. From the report on the State of Childhood (in the Adolescence section) to the “Childlore” nostalgia (in Elementary) to several posts on phone bans, find a wealth of reflections on being a kid today.
In the STEM section, find what appears to be a remarkable scientific breakthrough: the discovery of a new circulatory system in the human body that may reconcile some elements modern and ancient medicine. It’s a humbling reminder that there is much more to the world than we know.
Also, an excellent AI Update this week at the end.
These and more, enjoy!
Peter

Browse and search over 16,000 curated articles from past issues online:
“If you are leading in a high-pressure environment, consider this reflection: In the last two weeks, have my leadership actions: Protected my teachers’ time? Protected their dignity? Strengthened their voice? Reduced unnecessary pressure? Increased their sense of belonging?”
“Nothing beats building relationships. If you follow this blog regularly, you might reasonably think that I’ve run out of ideas. That’s because I just wrote at some length about the importance of building relationships with students. There, I wrote about how building solid relationships with students is the best way to deal with the ever-shifting issues that face our profession: Nothing beats having solid relationships with students. Not the best slides, the most innovative activities, the most alternative of grading systems. If students don’t trust you, none of the rest matters.”
“What’s wild is how many of us grew up doing, drawing, singing, and believing the exact same funny little things: Miss Susie had a steamboat, Batman smelled, the floor was lava, and stepping on cracks broke our mothers’ backs.”
“The study, conducted by the Postsecondary Commission with the help of independent research firm Mathematica, looked at the earnings of more than 900,000 students who enrolled in bachelor’s, associate, or certificate programs at public colleges in Texas between the 2008-9 and 2018-19 academic years. The findings confirm many previous studies that getting a college degree is profitable over time, said Stig Leschly, the founder and president of the Postsecondary Commission.”
“Effective instructional coaching doesn’t have to require weeks of intensive work—sometimes four conversations are enough.”
“Survey data suggest that most secondary ELA teachers did assign at least one full book to students during the 2024–2025 school year. However, the findings reveal a more nuanced picture. Survey results suggest that full-book reading remains peripheral in most secondary ELA classrooms; 9 percent of teachers did not assign any full books, and about two-thirds of teachers assigned only one to four books. Teachers’ reports also suggest inequities to accessing full books: Teachers who served more historically disadvantaged students consistently assigned fewer full books—a pattern that begins as early as elementary school.”
“That interstitial spaces exist in and under the skin and between and around the body’s organs had been observed going back more than a century, but they were assumed to exist in isolation from one another, like a patchwork quilt. Theise and his colleagues published their first observations of these spaces in 2018. Their findings in the 2021 tattoo-ink study implied that the body’s interstitial spaces were parts of a vast interconnected whole — what scientists now call the interstitium.”
A week for countering polarization in discussions…
I grow weary of polarizing headlines. Maybe you do, too? Seems every week AI will destroy the world or save the world. We see it elsewhere: in politics, in recent pandemic decisions. We seem to be all or nothing. I even remember this as a kid when in the car: someone would crank the air conditioning, and the car would be freezing. And then they’d turn up the heat, and it would be suffocating. So it was a relief to see the obvious conclusion in this week’s review of the impact of AI on learning: “ChatGPT’s cognitive effects are contingent on pedagogical framing.”
There’s a similar take on AI’s impact on the economy. One side is “AI will take all the jobs”, and the other side is “AI will create all the jobs.” The feature post by A16z appears to lean on the latter side, but actually suggests that the economy will really simply evolve and the amount of work is likely to remain similar to today.
All that said, the changes to our lives are and will be significant. Even with AI as a normal technology, per last year’s philosophical framing.
It’s a short but diverse collection this week, including a new book out specifically on AI in fundraising.
These and more, enjoy!
Peter

“Analysis revealed that, ChatGPT supports cognitive development when embedded within inquiry-oriented and scaffolded instructional designs, especially through processes such as metacognitive regulation, argumentative reasoning, and idea generation, which in turn produce synergistic gains across both critical and creative domains. However, in unstructured contexts, researchers observed asymmetrical patterns favoring creativity over critical thinking and joint declines across domains, both of which often triggered cognitive offloading. These findings highlight that ChatGPT's cognitive effects are contingent on pedagogical framing.”
“Of course AI will absolutely eliminate some tasks and compress some roles (and there’s some evidence that that may already be happening). The shape of the labor market will change, as it always does when a transformational technology is unlocked. But the claim that AI will produce economy-wide, permanent unemployment is unhelpful marketing, bad economics and worse history. To the contrary, productivity gains should increase demand for labor, because labor becomes more valuable. Here is our argument why.”
“We’re trying to put forward tools and research where AI becomes part of new expressive capabilities for students, rather than information dumpers into people’s heads.” Victor Lee, Associate Professor of Education”
“When students turn in a writing assignment, I take their paper (long, short, doesn't matter) and I send it to Claude or ChatGPT with a simple prompt: Take this paper and create a five-question knowledge comprehension quiz based on the information in it. Next day, every student gets a quiz. On their own paper.”
“Curiosity is the whole game”
“A parallel set of memes has emerged to capture the sense of powerlessness. In the United States, Silicon Valley tech elites identify as high agency, while the rest of us are bots condemned to the permanent underclass. In China, ordinary workers describe themselves as shechu (“corporate cattle”) and jiabangou (“overtime dogs”). These workers have long used the viral term “involution” to capture the feeling of being trapped in a cycle of meaningless competition. In both countries, those disaffected by A.I. identify with the gaming meme of the NPC, or nonplayer character. They feel like the background role in someone else’s video game, existing only to fill the world, not to shape it.”
Every week I send out articles I encounter from around the web. Subject matter ranges from hard knowledge about teaching to research about creativity and cognitive science to stories from other industries that, by analogy, inform what we do as educators. This breadth helps us see our work in new ways.
Readers include teachers, school leaders, university overseers, conference organizers, think tank workers, startup founders, nonprofit leaders, and people who are simply interested in what’s happening in education. They say it helps them keep tabs on what matters most in the conversation surrounding schools, teaching, learning, and more.
– Peter Nilsson