A weekly collection of education-related news from around the web.

Educator’s Notebook #510 (January 11, 2026)

INTRODUCTION

  • In this week’s features, find a fascinating and thought provoking read framed by the question: does being intelligent make us happy? It explores how we define intelligence, especially in relation to poorly defined problems vs well defined problems. It juxtaposes doing well in school (a well defined problem) with living happily (a poorly defined — or complex — problem).  The post prompts meaningful questions about what we teach and why.

    Also in the features, find a study reported by Carl Hendrick that revisits some of the nuance in “Thinking Fast and Slow.” It offers some insight into how we think about intuition and what leads to sound intuition.

    Also this week, I was heartened to see the report in the pedagogy section on how effective math teachers use more math vocabulary. The report is about 4th and 5th grade teachers, but I suspect the principle applies to all grades. I recall when I was a hiring leader across departments, when interviewing candidates, I would listen for whether and how they used the language of their discipline. When I asked about their undergraduate or graduate work, when asking about what attracted them to the field, or what courses they most love teaching and why, I wanted to hear them automatically use the language and structure of their discipline.  I’m glad to know that research is bearing out that this trait makes a difference.

    Also this week… the book comes out! So here’s the most important aspect of the book: it’s about teaching and learning first and then about AI in the context of teaching and learning. It’s not a pro-AI book or an anti-AI book — it’s about about lesson design, feedback, student agency, research, productive struggle, and much more — and about how AI interacts with all of these, including concrete next steps for teachers and leaders alike. It’s a book that captures many of the key principles of good practice and learning science that decades of research and experience have taught us as a field, and then sees AI through the lens of that professional knowledge.

    This is why Maha Bali writes “It is so rare to find a book on AI in education that is neither uncritically enthusiastic nor completely resistant, but one that makes space for readers who have diverse value systems and philosophies of education… Here is a book that helps you on the conceptual level, gives you practical tips, and most importantly, respects the reader as a whole person and not just a role. This is a book that I plan to use with fellow teachers and students alike.”

    Are you looking for a book that will help you or your faculty with principles and practices of excellent teaching and learning — and how AI relates to that?  Pre-order here. And hear a good overview and introduction to the book in our recent interview on EdTech Insiders (at the guest section at 46 min).

    Much, much more this week, including two different but excellent features in the AI Update below.

    These and more, enjoy!

    Peter

    PS. Where you can find me:

    • January 13 – FETC (Orlando, FL) — “How to Leverage AI + Learning Science for More Human, Passionate Teaching” — Maya and I will be examining what learning science offers for ways AI can advance our human interests and motivation as teachers.
    • January 16 — Book release! — Almost there…!  Alllllmost there…..!
    • February 18 — NAIS Webinar (online, member schools) — “How to Assess in the Time of AI” — Join us as we explore setting and communicating AI use guidelines, as well as new frames for thinking about assessment and learning design.
    • February 25-27 – NAIS (Seattle, WA) — “Getting to Why with AI: Supporting and Empowering Teachers in Changing Times” — Explore with us how competing teaching philosophies are crowding out clear thinking about AI (and how to clarify them in your community), how changes in student capabilities are prompting the need for new skills and literacies, and how the arrival AI is actually helping us identify—and therefore affirm and accentuate — what forms the heart of our human experience. This session is a Master Class in the conference that requires additional registration.
    • March 9-12 – SXSW EDU (Austin, TX) — “Schooled the Musical” — Yes, snuck in the middle of the all the AI work is a staged reading of the full length musical I’m developing. With a Hamilton-meets –The Sound of Music-meets-Good Night and Good Luck story, it follows the lives of three students as they discover what they can and cannot learn in school. Written in both contemporary and classical styles, this developmental performance will be directed by an alum from Disney’s Aladdin on Broadway and will include an extraordinarily talented young cast. See a four minute overview of the show here.
    • March 18 —  NAIS Webinar (online, member schools) — “What’s New in AI for Schools” — Here we’re looking beyond the immediate concerns of teaching and learning in today’s technology climate to larger questions about AI companions, anticipated developments in AI tutoring, and other emerging technology trends. 

     

    Do good teachers make engaged leaders? See the post in Leadership for more.

     


     

    The book comes out this week! Pre-order from Amazon or from Solution Tree. Contact me (reply to this email) for discounted bulk orders.

     


     

    Browse and search over 15,000 curated articles from past issues online:

    Subscribe to the Educator’s Notebook

    • Carl Hendrick
    • 01/10/26

    “Sound thinkers are not primarily characterised by their capacity to correct intuitive errors through deliberation. Rather, they appear to be distinguished by their ability to intuit correctly in the first place… What makes some people better intuitive thinkers than others? …Using a verbal fluency task to map participants’ semantic networks, the researchers found that individuals with more interconnected, flexible semantic memory structures displayed higher rates of correct intuitive responding. Specifically, those who performed well intuitively had semantic networks characterised by shorter path lengths between concepts, greater local clustering, and fewer distinct sub-networks. Their knowledge was not siloed but integrated… This distinction is important and worth dwelling on. The study does not show that knowing more stuff produces better intuition. It shows that having a more interconnected, flexible semantic architecture does…. The question of whether education can cultivate the kind of flexible, interconnected semantic networks that support sound intuition remains open.”

    • Experimental History
    • 08/09/22

    “We’ve got no problem fawning over people who are good at solving well-defined problems. They get to be called “professor” and “doctor….” People who are good at solving poorly defined problems don't get the same kind of kudos. They don’t get any special titles or clubs. There is no test they can take that will spit out a big, honking number that will make everybody respect them. And that’s a shame. My grandma does not know how to use the “input” button on her TV’s remote control, but she does know how to raise a family full of good people who love each other, how to carry on through a tragedy, and how to make the perfect pumpkin pie.”

ADMISSIONS

CHARACTER

CURRICULUM

DIVERSITY/INCLUSION

    • Chronicle of Higher Ed
    • 01/07/26
    • Chronicle of Higher Ed
    • 11/20/25

    “Intellectual pluralism should be more than an exercise in gathering discrete political viewpoints into a common educational frame… Instead, as Amanda Anderson has argued, it should mean cultivating the individual, internal intellectual agility essential to think beyond “positions” whose political implications are set. Neatly declarable viewpoints, no matter which ones or how many, should not be the academy’s stock-in-trade. Scholarly materials worth grappling with rarely fit within summary political containers, and powerful ideas are ideologically mobile.”

EARLY CHILDHOOD

GOVERNMENT

HIGHER ED

HUMANITIES

LEADERSHIP

PEDAGOGY

READING/WRITING

STEM

    • New York Times
    • 01/05/26

    “Once, scientists believed in the four humors as the key to health, in phlogiston as the essence of fire and in the ether as the carrier of light. Eggs were bad for you, then fine, then maybe bad again. Even Newtonian physics, once considered unshakable, was revised by Einstein. If so many widely accepted theories have been discarded, why should we trust the ones we have now? It’s a sobering question but also a misleading one. It implies that the only possible attitudes toward science are naïve faith and wholesale pessimism… Fortunately, there is another attitude to adopt toward science — one you might call disciplined trust — that would serve us much better. It just happens to require some actual knowledge of science and some intellectual humility.”

    • Stanford
    • 01/05/26

    "The big breakthroughs often come when concepts from a different field get brought to bear on a problem for the first time.”

TECH

WORKPLACE

GENERAL

A.I. Update

A.I. UPDATE

  • In one of this week’s features, the CEO of Notion meaningfully reflects on how technology has changed industry over the past centuries — and from that looks ahead to how AI may further change industry. I think he’s right for the most part, but misses a key point. Those businesses that have identified the technology infrastructure upon which the future world will be built have indeed facilitated extraordinary transformation. But the post overlooks that while some industries scale exponentially, others remain grounded in human interactions, where relationships are built, where purpose is found, and where meaning is made. As our technology advances further and further, the distance between the scaled world and the lived world grows farther and farther. Culturally, we need to wrestle with this, which is part of why talking with our students and faculty about AI is so important. It’s why H. G. Wells wrote in 1920 that “human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.”

    Also in the features, find research from the AI company QuestionWell about what makes good multiple choice questions and how they have tuned their model to produce better multiple choice questions.

    Also this week, a good post about how AI “isn’t just predicting the next word anymore.” This is a good reminder as we engage in discussion with skeptics. The technology is advancing rapidly.

    These and more, enjoy!

    Peter

    What makes good multiple choice questions? See how QuestionWell is tuning their model to produce better questions.

     

    • QuestionWell
    • 12/28/25

    “Writing good multiple-choice questions (MCQs) is well studied and well known to be difficult, even for human beings. Decades of  research document common flaws: inadvertently giving students cues, implausible distractors, ambiguity, and questions that reward test taking strategies, and allow students to side-step understanding. Large language models (LLMs) make many of the same errors as human question writers. At QuestionWell, we push our AI to do better. This fall, we trained our AI model specifically to reduce well-documented item writing flaws in multiple choice questions.”

    • Notion
    • 12/22/25

    “My co-founder Simon was what we call a 10× programmer, but he rarely writes code these days. Walk by his desk and you'll see him orchestrating three or four AI coding agents at once, and they don't just type faster, they think, which together makes him a 30-40× engineer. He queues tasks before lunch or bed, letting them work while he's away. He's become a manager of infinite minds.”

TECH/AI: EDUCATION

TECH/AI: ETHICS AND RISK

TECH/AI: INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT

TECH/AI: SOCIAL

    • EdTech Insiders
    • 01/08/26

    “Unlike the solo AI agent paradigm dominating headlines, multi-user collaborative AI represents something fundamentally different and truly exciting: AI as social infrastructure that strengthens relationships and encourages collaboration. This is why one of my predictions for 2026 is that it will be the year that “Social AI” breaks into the mainstream, especially in education.”

TECH/AI: USES AND APPLICATIONS

Issues

Every week I send out articles I encounter from around the web. Subject matter ranges from hard knowledge about teaching to research about creativity and cognitive science to stories from other industries that, by analogy, inform what we do as educators. This breadth helps us see our work in new ways.

Readers include teachers, school leaders, university overseers, conference organizers, think tank workers, startup founders, nonprofit leaders, and people who are simply interested in what’s happening in education. They say it helps them keep tabs on what matters most in the conversation surrounding schools, teaching, learning, and more.

Peter Nilsson

Subscribe

* indicates required