A good week of posts.
Two teaching and learning features this week. In one, find an interesting discourse on the difference between teaching for critical thinking and teaching for judgement. The post helpfully includes a series of ideas for what kinds of classroom activities help foster the latter. Also in the features, find one professor’s recounting of a semester experiment with a new type of grading system. It’s a good read if you’re interested trying or encouraging the same.
Also this week, find some delightful gems: a musical about the Underground Railroad to Mexico, a narrative about staring at a painting for three hours (a balm for our attention saturated times), a thoughtful (and sometimes humorous, sometimes poignant) personal glossary, and some excellent STEM reads.
These and more, enjoy!
Peter
PS. Here are some events on my calendar — with more to come in the time ahead. Drop me a line if you’ll be there, too. It would be great to say hello!

Browse and search over 15,000 curated articles from past issues online:
“Most critical thinking instruction assumes that teaching analytical procedures will produce good judgment. But procedures alone can't replace the pattern recognition that comes from varied experience in authentic contexts. Students need opportunities to make complex decisions, compare their approaches with expert judgment, and understand the heuristics that drive rapid recognition. This requires fundamentally different learning environments—ones that prioritize realistic constraints, authentic challenges, and reflective comparison over information delivery and procedural practice. Case studies and judgment-oriented games are historically a pain to develop, but not any more with AI’s help. Game design can even be an output of a learning experience, where more experienced learners help design interesting cases that strengthen future students’ thinking.”
“This shift to collaborative grading had two main unexpected outcomes. The first was the ability to course-correct mid-semester… The second was an enormous increase in the completion of low-stakes work.”
“This isn’t going to work as an article about museum visitors’ contracted attention spans. The gallery isn’t crowded, but everyone who enters goes straight to “Las Meninas” and is absorbed. The Prado doesn’t allow them to take photos, so they look and are hooked. The painting has a gravitational pull. I’ve spoken to a few onlookers. In general, people seem to spend about 10 minutes looking at the painting.”
“The administration announced a slew of across-the-board cuts for higher education grant programs, including $350 million for minority-serving institutions."
“It’s been a hard few years to be a social studies educator in America. Teachers have taught through two impeachments, several contentious presidential elections, the rise in online misinformation, a pandemic, a racial reckoning that launched nationwide protest movements, and the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. They’ve had to help their students parse these events in real time—many while teaching under state laws restricting how they can talk about race, gender, and other issues deemed controversial in the classroom. Now, they’re navigating politically charged headlines about constitutional interpretation and the limits of the president’s executive authority.”
“Productivity. Definition 1: The religion of people afraid to ask they’re producing, or why… the productive day is the good day, the unproductive day a moral failure requiring analysis and improvement strategies. Definition 2: What revealed itself as something different during that evening in Wyoming when I saw on a boulder the size of a small building and watched the sun set over land that had never been optimized for anything.”
““I think most cognitive aspects of mind — the disciplined mind, the synthesizing mind, and the creative mind — will be done so well by large language machines and mechanisms that whether we do them as humans will be optional,” he said. “On the other hand, I don’t believe for a minute that aspects of respect — how we deal with other human beings — and ethics — how we deal with difficult issues as citizens, as professionals — can or should be consigned to even the most articulate and multifaceted, intelligent machines.””
“Key Finding 4: Educator professional learning is a focus for state leaders and remains an unmet need.”
Some gems here, too.
In the features, see how the field of radiology is adjusting to the arrival of AI. As in other fields (…), it appears that AI is changing human work, not replacing it. There are lessons to be learned here for how people talk about education. Also, the Pew Research report about how people would react to different experiences if they knew AI was involved in it isn’t really surprising — except perhaps for the number of people who would have little to no reaction at all. I think that is the important insight. It is likely that as AI spreads more and more widely, people (writ large) shrug it off and begin assuming that it is simply omnipresent. What this means for what we value, however — especially our sense of agency and ownership — is where we need to focus our attention.
Also this week: a small surge in writing on AI risks and several posts on how people are using AI. Google’s NotebookLM, in particular, is the sleeper hit. I find it increasingly useful. See the post in Uses and Applications for a new function in the tool.
These and more, enjoy!
Peter

“In many jobs, tasks are diverse, stakes are high, and demand is elastic. When this is the case, we should expect software to initially lead to more human work, not less. The lesson from a decade of radiology models is neither optimism about increased output nor dread about replacement. Models can lift productivity, but their implementation depends on behavior, institutions and incentives. For now, the paradox has held: the better the machines, the busier radiologists have become.”
“Responses to all seven scenarios lean more negative than positive. But many Americans don’t express an opinion in either direction, with sizable shares saying their view would not change if they learned that AI was used in various settings.”
“Now generative A.I. will compete with you for your power, water and land.”
Every week I send out articles I encounter from around the web. Subject matter ranges from hard knowledge about teaching to research about creativity and cognitive science to stories from other industries that, by analogy, inform what we do as educators. This breadth helps us see our work in new ways.
Readers include teachers, school leaders, university overseers, conference organizers, think tank workers, startup founders, nonprofit leaders, and people who are simply interested in what’s happening in education. They say it helps them keep tabs on what matters most in the conversation surrounding schools, teaching, learning, and more.
– Peter Nilsson