A weekly collection of education-related news from around the web.

Educator’s Notebook #507 (November 16, 2025)

INTRODUCTION

  • An excellent issue!

    In this week’s features, find an excellent piece by Zaretta Hammond in Cult of Pedagogy on tactical moves to help students build meta-learning skills. Looking to help your students become more self-aware learners? This is a good place to look. Also in the features, see the post from Grading for Growth that explores four pillars for alternative grading. Looking to rethink your assessment practice? Consider starting there.

    So many other great posts: leadership, language, learning science… and those are just the L’s!

    Among them, find an HBR post on how AI can support governing boards (!). It’s actually a fascinating piece that details a study in which human teams were compared against multi-agent AI teams with the same charge. The researchers observed that the AI teams more often followed best practices, surfaced more diverse perspectives, and accomplished the board goals, while the human teams often allowed individuals to dominate the conversation and lost track of time, and were therefore unable to finish what needed to be done. Both groups also self-assessed. My knee-jerk reaction was defensiveness; maybe this discursiveness is what makes us human and is the source of our creative, messy, human spirit. Surely, this is true. And yet, we will surely also benefit from assistants that help us engage more people and help us reach our goals. Balance, as ever, is key.  Who knew we’d live in an age when this was even a topic?

    Also, I had a wonderful and wide-ranging conversation with Morva McDonald from NAIS’ New View EDU series about AI, teacher collaboration, the innovation imperative for independent schools, and more. Find a recording here or wherever you get your podcasts.

    Also this week, a reader is running some research on high school teacher knowledge of ADHD. If you have 15 minutes to share your experience, he would be grateful. The survey is at this link.

    These and much more, enjoy!

    Peter

    PS. More dates are coming together for the spring.

     


    Pre-order Irreplaceable: How AI Changes Everything (and Nothing) in Teaching and Learning


     

    The Four Pillars of Alternative Grading. See the feature for more detail.

     


     

    Browse and search over 15,000 curated articles from past issues online:

    Subscribe to the Educator’s Notebook

    • Grading for Growth
    • 11/10/25

    “Clearly Defined Standards… Helpful Feedback… Marks Indicate Progress… Reattempts Without Penalty”

    • Cult of Pedagogy
    • 11/09/25

    “We can teach our hearts out, but in the end, only the learner learns. So, how do we get students to own their learning? That’s the question I’m answering in Rebuilding Students’ Learning Power (Corwin, 2025). Rather than simply talking to students about how their brain learns or trying to motivate them, we want to couple these approaches with specific tools and moves that help them become a good information processor that makes learning sticky. We start by offering them a set of learn-to-learn skills.”

ADOLESCENCE

ARTS

ASSESSMENT

CHARACTER

CREATIVITY

CURRICULUM

DIVERSITY/INCLUSION

    • EdWeek
    • 11/05/25

    “More than 80% of K-12 teachers thought it was “very” or “extremely” important to teach students about the Constitution’s core values, and 62% found it similarly crucial to teach that America is a fundamentally good country. In both cases, teachers were more likely than parents or the public at large to favor teaching these concepts.”

GOVERNMENT

HIGHER ED

HUMANITIES

LANGUAGE

LEADERSHIP

LEARNING SCIENCE

PEDAGOGY

READING/WRITING

STEM

TECH

WORKPLACE

GENERAL

A.I. Update

A.I. UPDATE

  • So much continues to happen…!

    I trimmed the six features down to the two about AI companions. One is stories of people who found love with AI companions in mid-life. This is happening more often than we think. The other looks more holistically at AI companions at all stages of life, but again through what they tell us about human love. It’s surprising that, already, this is not a niche topic.

    And there were still four other posts I wanted to put in features. Find them in other sections: education (AI-supported tutoring is showing measurable gains), ethics and risk (AI now rivals humans in political persuasion), industry development (AI labs are building world models to prepare for embodied AI), and uses and applications (how to assess your workplace for agentic AI). Each of these marks significant advances that will change the texture of our lives. We live in remarkable times.

    These and more, enjoy!

    Peter

    Looking for a mechanism for measuring your AI progress? The AI Innovation Index is designed to assess progress with AI readiness across students, staff, leadership, culture, and more. See the Education section for more detail.
    • New York Times
    • 11/05/25

    “How do you end up with an A.I. lover? Some turned to them during hard times in their real-world marriages, while others were working through past trauma. Though critics have sounded alarms about dangers like delusional thinking, research from M.I.T. has found that these relationships can be therapeutic, providing “always-available support” and significantly reducing loneliness. We spoke with three people in their 40s and 50s about the wonders — and anxieties — of romance with a chatbot.”

    • Berkeley
    • 11/04/25

    “The global scale and reach of AI companions is astonishing… These numbers tell us three things. One, AI-human romance isn’t niche—it’s mainstream, especially among young adults. Two, globally, gender is nearly balanced—slightly more male than female—or nearly 50-50 across major reports. And three, most users dip in for comfort or curiosity rather than long-term attachment—suggesting that what people seek from AI love may not be “romance,” but reliable empathy. That gap itself may teach us something important about what people really want from AI love.”

TECH/AI: EDUCATION

TECH/AI: ETHICS AND RISK

    • Stanford
    • 11/06/25

    “Participants showed more openness to opposing views when the arguments were attributed to AI, perceiving it as more objective. The findings raise concerns about potential misinformation and increased polarization, with researchers urging caution in utilizing AI in political discourse.”

TECH/AI: INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT

TECH/AI: USES AND APPLICATIONS

Issues

Every week I send out articles I encounter from around the web. Subject matter ranges from hard knowledge about teaching to research about creativity and cognitive science to stories from other industries that, by analogy, inform what we do as educators. This breadth helps us see our work in new ways.

Readers include teachers, school leaders, university overseers, conference organizers, think tank workers, startup founders, nonprofit leaders, and people who are simply interested in what’s happening in education. They say it helps them keep tabs on what matters most in the conversation surrounding schools, teaching, learning, and more.

Peter Nilsson

Subscribe

* indicates required