A weekly collection of education-related news from around the web.

Educator’s Notebook #509 (January 4, 2026)

INTRODUCTION

  • An epic issue to start the year – three notes to kick it off:

    • The book is out in less than two weeks! Find out what Howard Gardner, Maha Bali, and Charles Fadel have to say about it.
    • This issue has a great selection from December to start your year off
    • Where to find me in the next few months

     

    The Book

    Obviously, the anticipation of the release is excruciating, especially since early feedback captures exactly what we’d hoped: it’s a book grounded in learning first and foremost, and it welcomes multiple perspectives into conversation about learning in a time of AI — not just now, but in the years to come.

    • Maha Bali writes, “It is so rare to find a book on AI in education that is neither uncritically enthusiastic nor completely resistant, but one that makes space for readers who have diverse value systems and philosophies of education.” 
    • Howard Gardner agrees, calling it “a thoughtful and balanced perspective on AI in education.” 
    • Charles Fadel writes, “AI is moving much faster than the education sector, making it hard for an author to provide advice that will withstand the test of the next five years’ worth of technological progress. Yet Bialik and Nilsson have achieved this tour de force, with a book full of timely, critical, and enduring advice for teachers.

     

    For an overview of what’s inside, our conversation on the EdTech Insiders podcast offers an excellent entry into some of the key ideas in the book. Take a listen here at the 46:00 mark for more on how leaders and teachers can organize their thinking about AI, how we can lower the temperature of discussions around AI, and more. You can pre-order copies on Amazon or from Solution Tree directly. If you are looking for a summer read for your faculty to think intentionally about AI, this book might be a good fit for you and your school.

    Last, over the past two years, I’ve worked with dozens of schools facilitating sessions for teachers, school leaders, and boards on topics related to AI. If you are looking for guidance on AI — for leaders, teachers, or boards — don’t hesitate to reach out.

     

    This Week’s Issue

    The features this week dig into the nuts and bolts and analog experience of teaching and learning. In one feature, look closely at how to write clearly defined standards for our classrooms. Clearly knowing why we are teaching what we are teaching is growing increasingly important in our AI age. The practice of writing standards or objectives or goals helps us achieve this focus as educators. In the other feature, enjoy Joan Westenberg’s short meditation on “thick desires” vs “thin desires.” These classifications help us see if the things we crave change us or simply occupy us. This is especially important in a time of digital dopamine hits.

    Also this week: end of year reflections include retrospectives on adolescents and technology use, a series of excellent posts on character, a full section on learning science, Australia’s social media law taking effect, and some writing about the passing of Tom Stoppard.

    These and more in our New Year, enjoy!

    Peter

     

    PS. Where you can find me in the next few months:

    • January 13 – FETC (Orlando, FL) — “How to Leverage AI + Learning Science for More Human, Passionate Teaching” — Maya and I will be examining insight from learning science into how AI can support more human-centered work for teachers.
    • January 16 — Book release!I can hardly believe it’s so close. There’s a gaping canyon between when you send the final manuscript to the publisher and when the print copies come out. Thank goodness I’ve been pre-occupied over the holidays.
    • February 18 — NAIS Webinar (online, member schools) — “Assessment in the Time of AI” — Join us as we explore setting and communicating AI use guidelines, as well as new frames for thinking about assessment and learning design.
    • February 25-27 – NAIS (Seattle, WA) — “Getting to Why with AI: Supporting and Empowering Teachers in Changing Times” — Explore with us how competing teaching philosophies are crowding out clear thinking about AI (and how to clarify them in your community), how changes in student capabilities are prompting the need for new skills and literacies, and how the arrival AI is actually helping us identify — and therefore affirm and strengthen — what forms the heart of our human experience. This session is a Master Class in the conference that requires additional registration.
    • March 9-12 – SXSW EDU (Austin, TX) — “Schooled the Musical” — Yes, snuck in the middle of the all the AI work is a staged reading of the full length musical I’m developing. With a Hamilton meets The Sound of Music meets Good Night and Good Luck story, it follows the lives of three students as they discover what they can and cannot learn in school. Written in both contemporary and classical styles, this developmental performance will be directed by an alum from Disney’s Aladdin on Broadway and will include an extraordinarily talented young cast.
    • March 18 —  NAIS Webinar (online, member schools) — “What’s New in AI for Schools” — Here we’re looking beyond immediate concerns about AI to forward-looking questions about AI companions, anticipated developments in AI tutoring, and other emerging technology trends. Join for insights into how this technology is likely to change adolescence and learning in the years ahead.
    Take a listen on EdTech Insiders for an introduction to and overview of our book. It’s about 30 minutes starting around 46:00. (Listen here)

     


     

    Browse and search over 15,000 curated articles from past issues online:

    Subscribe to the Educator’s Notebook

    • Grading for Growth
    • 12/22/25

    “Having clearly defined standards is the first of the Four Pillars of Alternative Grading, and in my view it’s the “floor” on which the other pillars stand… First, a review: Let’s recap a few things that have been said here before, starting with the definition of a “standard”. A standard is a clear and observable description of an action that a student can take to demonstrate their learning of some specific topic.”

    • Joan Westenberg
    • 12/15/25

    “A thick desire is one that changes you in the process of pursuing it. A thin desire is one that doesn’t."

ADMISSIONS

    • AP News
    • 12/02/25

    ““Humans and AI working together — that is the key right now. Every step along the way can be greatly improved: transcript reading, essay reviews, telling us things we might be missing about the students,” said Pacheco, a former assistant director of admission at Loyola University Chicago. “Ten years from now, all bets are off. I’m guessing AI will be admitting students.””

ADOLESCENCE

    • New York Times
    • 11/24/25

    “The experience of school has changed rapidly in recent generations. Starting in the 1980s, a metrics-obsessed regime took over American education and profoundly altered the expectations placed on children, up and down the class ladder. In fact, it has altered the experience of childhood itself… “What’s happening is, instead of saying, ‘We need to fix the schools,’ the message is, ‘We need to fix the kids,’” said Peter Gray, a research professor at Boston College.”

    • EdWeek
    • 11/20/25

    “Civil War-era hand-clapping songs (“Miss Susie had a steamboat,” etc.), Gen-Xers’ graffiti-filled notebooks, and yes, six-seven shrugs in 2025 all fall into a part of children’s culture known as childlore. Childlore is a distinctive genre that includes all the games, rituals, stories, and other activities passed from child to child in playgrounds, classrooms, and now, in the 21st century, via social media.”

ARTS

ASSESSMENT

    • The Argument
    • 11/18/25

    “The students were broadly receiving good grades, too: More than a quarter of the students needing remedial math had a 4.0 grade point average in math. The average was 3.7. In fact, the report found that on average, student grades in 2025 rose compared to those of students admitted in 2020. Instead, here is the absurd image that the report slowly and painstakingly paints: A number of high schools are awarding A grades to AP Calculus students who do not have any calculus skills and who would get the lowest possible score on the AP Calculus exam if they took it.”

CHARACTER

DIVERSITY/INCLUSION

GOVERNMENT

HEALTH

HIGHER ED

HUMANITIES

LANGUAGE

    • New York Times
    • 12/23/25

    “Before we turn the calendar page, take a moment to test your knowledge of the often absurd, sometimes funny, rude or useful words that helped define 2025.”

LEADERSHIP

LEARNING SCIENCE

PEDAGOGY

READING/WRITING

SAFETY

SOCIAL MEDIA

STEM

TECH

WORKPLACE

GENERAL

A.I. Update

A.I. UPDATE

  • ….even when that month spans a holiday (or two)…

    In the features, find two excellent pieces about the adolescent experience, including one with advice to adolescents about engaging with AI today. Also in the features (four total!), find two reports from major labs with insight into how people are using AI in the workplace and for personal purposes.  These offer helpful insight into the extraordinary speed with which AI has entered our lives.

    Also in this issue, find a wealth of articles with new ways AI is serving schools: from a professor’s use of AI to make a visualization of his syllabus to the prospect of on-demand tools and simulations to dialogue-based techniques that focus student attention on oral participation.

    Also, the self-driving taxi race is heating up.  (Well, not a driving race… they drive very cautiously — more safely than humans, in fact.). Look also at how AI is playing a role in more and more workplaces.

    These and more, enjoy!

    Peter

    Where is the most money being spent on AI? Healthcare, by a long shot. But Law, the creative economy, government, and education are also heavily invested. See the Menlo Ventures report for more.
    • Teaching in the Age of AI
    • 12/22/25

    “I suspect many high school students simply ask the first question when determining the calculus of AI use: Will I get caught? It’s heartening to know others are weighing the more critical question: Will I learn? Both are operating rationally within a decision making framework, but only one produces the outcome educators want. It’s clear that neither approach has much to do with school policy. The first student has already concluded AI policies are rarely an effective deterrent – the odds of getting caught are so low it’s worth the risk. The second has internalized reasons that have nothing to do with the actual rules. What both positions lack is any semblance of adult guidance. Students are primarily making these choices on their own.”

    • Microsoft
    • 12/10/25
    • Alex Kotran
    • 12/09/25

    “Here’s what I want you to take away: uncertainty isn’t the same as helplessness. You don’t need to predict the future to prepare for it. The people who thrive in moments like this aren’t the ones who guessed right about which industries would boom—they’re the ones who built the capacity to adapt, to learn, to push through hard things, and to work with others.”

    • Anthropic
    • 12/04/25

TECH/AI: EDUCATION

TECH/AI: ETHICS AND RISK

TECH/AI: GOVERNMENT AND LAW

TECH/AI: INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT

TECH/AI: SOCIAL

TECH/AI: USES AND APPLICATIONS

TECH/AI: GENERAL

Issues

Every week I send out articles I encounter from around the web. Subject matter ranges from hard knowledge about teaching to research about creativity and cognitive science to stories from other industries that, by analogy, inform what we do as educators. This breadth helps us see our work in new ways.

Readers include teachers, school leaders, university overseers, conference organizers, think tank workers, startup founders, nonprofit leaders, and people who are simply interested in what’s happening in education. They say it helps them keep tabs on what matters most in the conversation surrounding schools, teaching, learning, and more.

Peter Nilsson

Subscribe

* indicates required